Evidence Hub

Randomized Clinical Feasibility Trial: Comparing a Restrictive and Protective Range-of-Motion Brace for the Nonsurgical Management of the Medial Collateral Ligament of the Knee

D. Hunter, Katie MacGregor, R. Shields, Amanda M. Black, Alexander Rezansoff, N. Mohtadi

Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

(1) Assess medial collateral ligament (MCL) laxity differences in nonoperatively treated acute MCL and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-MCL injuries with 2 range of motion (ROM) knee brace settings. (2) Describe knee ROM, brace satisfaction, overall knee score, adherence, pain, quality of life, and knee function. (3) Assess feasibility of larger trial.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, single-blinded feasibility clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty-four adults with acute moderate-to-severe isolated MCL or combined ACL-MCL injuries at the University of Calgary Sport Medicine Centre.

INTERVENTION

Random assignment to the protected (0-90 degrees) or restricted (30-90 degrees) brace group. Four weeks of constant brace wearing, followed by daytime wear until 6 weeks. Rehabilitation exercises prescribed from 2 weeks onward. Follow-up for 12 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical outcomes included side-to-side difference (SSD) MCL laxity (mm) at 30 degrees knee flexion and 0 degree, ROM, patient-reported pain, overall knee ratings, brace satisfaction, daily adherence, international knee documentation committee subjective, and ACL-quality of life (QOL) collected throughout 12 weeks (baseline, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 weeks). The outcome assessor was masked to treatment group allocation.

RESULTS

At 12 weeks, 73% had <1 mm SSD valgus laxity at 30 degrees knee flexion, with 82% in the restricted group and 67% in the protected group. All patients reported improved pain; none suffered a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free