Evidence Hub

A randomized controlled trial and prospective cohort investigating antivenom for red-bellied black snake envenomation

G. Isbister, Shane Jenkins, M. Downes, Kellie Fakes, N. Buckley

Clinical toxicology, 2024

68 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Antivenom is first line treatment for snake envenomation worldwide, despite few placebo controlled clinical trials demonstrating effectiveness. We aimed to investigate whether early antivenom in red-bellied black snake (Pseudechis porphyriacus) bites would prevent systemic myotoxicity. Methods We undertook a multicentre randomized placebo-controlled trial of antivenom for red-bellied black snake bites with patients recruited from the Australian Snakebite Project (July 2014 to June 2020). In addition, we report all patients with red-bellied black snake bites during the same period, comparing the same outcomes. Patients over 2 years of age with definite red-bellied black snake bites and early systemic effects were randomized to receive 50 per cent glucose (placebo) or tiger snake antivenom within 6 hours post-bite, or in the cohort group received antivenom determined by the treating clinician. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with myotoxicity (peak creatine kinase activity >1,000 U/L). Secondary outcomes were: area under the curve of total creatine kinase elevation over 48 hours, presence of venom post-antivenom, and adverse reactions. We analyzed both the randomized control trial patients and the combination of randomized control trial and cohort patients. Results Fifteen patients were recruited to the randomized controlled trial, and a cohort of 68 patients who were not randomized were included in the analysis. After treatment, two of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 68 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free