Evidence Hub

The design and rationale of a multicenter real-world trial: the Southeastern Collaboration to Improve Blood Pressure Control in the US Black Belt – Addressing the Triple Threat

M. Safford, D. Cummings, Jacqueline R. Halladay, J. Shikany, J. Richman, S. Oparil, J. Hollenberg, Alyssa D. Adams et al.

Contemporary Clinical Trials, 2023

1,596 participants · 9 citations

Abstract

Background: Impoverished African Americans (AA) with hypertension face poor health outcomes. Purpose: To conduct a cluster-randomized trial testing two interventions, alone and in combination, to improve blood pressure (BP) control in AA with persistently uncontrolled hypertension. Methods: We engaged primary care practices serving rural Alabama and North Carolina residents, and in each practice we recruited approximately 25 AA adults with persistently uncontrolled hypertension (mean systolic BP >140 mm Hg over the year prior to enrollment plus enrollment day BP assessed by research assistants ≥140/90 mm Hg). Practices were randomized to peer coaching (PC), practice facilitation (PF), both PC and PF (PC+PF), or enhanced usual care (EUC). Coaches met with participants from PC and PC+PF practices weekly for 8 weeks then monthly over one year, discussing lifestyle changes, medication adherence, home monitoring, and communication with the healthcare team. Facilitators met with PF and PC+PF practices monthly to implement ≥1 quality improvement intervention in each of four domains. Data were collected at 0, 6, and 12 months. Results: We recruited 69 practices and 1596 participants; 18 practices (408 participants) were randomized to EUC, 16 (384 participants) to PF, 19 (424 participants) to PC, and 16 (380 participants) to PC+PF. Participants had mean age 57 years, 61% were women, and 56% reported annual income <$20,000. Limitations: The PF intervention acts at the practice level,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 1,596 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free