Evidence Hub

A randomized phase III clinical trial of acupuncture for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in survivors of cancer

Ivana Lopez-Nieves, C. Chiang, K. Han, L. Piulson, C. Seluzicki, Matthew Weitzman, Yi Lily Zhang, Iris Zhi et al.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2023

250 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

TPS12144 Background: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common and debilitating side effect in cancer survivors that can last long after completion of neurotoxic chemotherapy. Patients with CIPN often experience neuropathy symptoms such as pain, tingling, numbness, paresthesia, and dysesthesia, which can lead to significant functional decline and diminished quality of life. This outcome highlights the importance of developing effective CIPN treatments to improve quality of life for this population. Identifying nonpharmacological approaches to reduce CIPN symptoms and improve cancer survivors’ outcomes is urgently needed. Acupuncture is a widely used, minimally invasive Traditional Chinese Medicine technique that has shown promising evidence as an effective and safe treatment for CIPN. We hypothesize that acupuncture may reduce CIPN pain and improve overall CIPN symptoms in cancer survivors. Methods: We are conducting a two-arm, parallel randomized clinical trial comparing electroacupuncture (EA) versus sham acupuncture (SA) in cancer survivors. The EA arm includes ten sessions of EA over eight weeks using a standardized, semi-fixed protocol developed by our group. The SA arm includes a sham technique that uses a combination of non-acupuncture points and a non-insertion procedure in ten sessions over eight weeks. The primary outcome of this study is the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form average pain item. The secondary outcomes are quantitative sensory…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 250 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free