Evidence Hub

The use of descriptive words and metaphor in patient and carer experience of palliative day care: secondary analysis of a qualitative study

Richardson J, Grose J

The open nursing journal, 2009

40 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An independent evaluation of changes to the delivery of Palliative Day Services was carried out during 2006-2007 using interviews with service users. The analysis found that the words and metaphors employed by users of services emphasized their emotional response to the changes, and helped to explain their depth of feeling about their experiences, warranting further investigation.

AIM: To conduct a secondary analysis on interview data collected for the Day Services Evaluation Study in order to understand how patients and their carers use descriptive words and metaphor when talking about their experiences of palliative day services.

METHODS: Interview transcripts from 40 patients and 8 carers were subjected to secondary thematic analysis. These were read individually and coded where metaphor or descriptive words had been used to emphasize the effect of the illness and the experiences of the Day Services.

FINDINGS: Examples of the metaphorical expressions and words used described the service as a 'secure rock in a changing world'; transition was felt as 'sadness', a 'betrayal', with feelings that the changes were 'bitter and twisted;' and left 'a black hole'. Post transition the mood had changed to acceptance 'When life throws lemons at you, you make lemonade'.

CONCLUSIONS: The metaphors and descriptive words used act as what we describe as 'emotional intensifiers' which provide a measure of the impact of the effect of illness, the effect of the day services on…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 40 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free