Evidence Hub

Clinical features and prognostic factors of anti-MDA5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis-associated interstitial lung disease with spontaneous mediastinal emphysema: a retrospective case series of nine patients

Ge S, Zhao Y, Qu F, Wu B

Frontiers in medicine, 2026

Abstract

Objective: Spontaneous pneumomediastinum (SPM) is a life-threatening complication of anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis (MDA5 + DM) associated interstitial lung disease (ILD), particularly in patients with rapidly progressive ILD (RP-ILD), which carries an extremely high mortality rate. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics, imaging features, and prognostic factors of MDA5 + DM-ILD patients with SPM to facilitate early detection and risk stratification of this high-risk population.

Methods: The study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of nine patients diagnosed with MDA5 + DM-ILD complicated by SPM at the center between June 2022 and February 2025. Collected data included demographic characteristics, laboratory biomarkers [including serum ferritin and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)], high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) findings assessed through the validated MDA5-specific computed tomography (MDA5-CT) scoring system, treatment regimens, and clinical outcomes.

Results: The cohort included 4 male and 5 female patients, with a median age of 62 years (range 42-69 years). All patients presented with RP-ILD and developed SPM during the disease course, with a median hospital stay of 10 days (range 4-31 days). The overall mortality rate was 87.5% (7/8, excluding 1 patient lost to follow-up). All non-survivors had high-risk MDA5-CT scores (>18 points), accompanied by significantly elevated serum…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free