Evidence Hub

Evaluation of cortical pathology in primary-progressive multiple sclerosis: a post hoc analysis of the SPRINT-MS trial

Krijnen EA, Bruijn AM, Eloyan A, Schoonheim MM, Fox RJ, Klawiter EC

BMJ neurology open, 2026

102 participants

Abstract

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) involves cortical injury, including cortical lesion (CL) development. Ibudilast treatment was found to slow progression of whole brain and cortical atrophy, but the effect of ibudilast on CLs is unknown. The present study aims to evaluate the treatment effect of ibudilast on CL development and whether the effect of ibudilast on brain atrophy is modified by CLs in primary-progressive MS (PPMS).

Methods: In this longitudinal study, we analysed data of 102 people with PPMS (ibudilast: n=49; placebo: n=53) from the Secondary and Primary Progressive Ibudilast NeuroNEXT Trial in Multiple Sclerosis. CLs were identified on artificial intelligence-generated double inversion-recovery images created from T1 and T2 images at 3T MRI and rated at baseline and week 96. Atrophy was measured by cortical thickness and brain parenchymal fraction.

Results: CLs were detected in all participants with PPMS with a median count of 22 (11-34) in the ibudilast group and 28 (13-44) in the placebo group. At baseline, treatment groups did not differ in any brain volume measure or CL count. Higher CL counts at baseline were associated with higher CL formation during follow-up (B(95% CI)=0.20 (0.12 to 0.29), pmean difference (SD)=0.07 (0.29), p=0.364). Protective effect of ibudilast on cortical thickness was more prominent in subjects with greater CL formation, but this relationship was not observed with whole brain atrophy.

Conclusions: Ibudilast treatment does not…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 102 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free