Evidence Hub

A robust platform for recombinant production of animal venom toxin modulators of ion channels

Gonzalez-Prada JE, Haworth AS, Browne JI, Salvage SC, Secomandi N, Rush AM, Ritoux A, Dannawi M et al.

2025

Abstract

ABSTRACT:

Background and Purpose: Peptide toxins isolated from animal venom are potent and selective modulators of ion channels, and promising therapeutic leads. Due to intricate disulphide bridge patterns, they are often challenging to produce in standard laboratory settings, which limits engineering approaches to manipulate their structure-function properties. Given the low cost, wide accessibility, and versatility of recombinant expression systems for protein production, we set out to establish a straightforward high-yield strategy across a broad panel of peptide toxins from snakes, spiders and scorpions.

Experimental Approach: 13 toxin DNA sequences were genetically fused to the C-terminus of either bivalent or monovalent human IgG1 antibody fragment crystallisable (Fc) domain sequences and expressed recombinantly from mammalian Expi293F cells. Affinity-purified proteins were evaluated by SDS-PAGE and size-exclusion chromatography (SEC). Function was assessed by Ca 2+ flux assays on CN21 cells, or whole-cell electrophysiology on human embryonic kidney (HEK293T) cells, Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, or dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons. Immunocytochemistry using HEK293T cells and mouse DRG neurons assessed Fc-toxin fusion binding.

Key Results: Monovalent Fc-toxin fusions consistently yielded 1-6 mg of pure, non-proteolytically cleaved protein from 20-70 ml cultures for several toxin types, including three-finger toxins from snakes, inhibitory cystine knot (ICK)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free