Evidence Hub

Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Injection Transitions Across Bevacizumab, Biosimilar, and Branded Medications: The IRIS Registry Study

Berkowitz ST, Gilbert JB, Ross CJ, Kearney WC, Lorch A, Miller JW, Rossin EJ, Sternberg P et al.

Journal of vitreoretinal diseases, 2026

Abstract

Purpose: To characterize antivascular endothelial growth factor medication transitions among patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), including delays in care and economic impacts. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study analyzed participants with nAMD in the IRIS (Intelligent Research in Sight) Registry who were treated with antivascular endothelial growth factor agents from 2015 to 2024. Four cohorts were analyzed: (1) bevacizumab only, (2) bevacizumab transitioned to a biosimilar, (3) bevacizumab transitioned to a branded agent, and (4) bevacizumab transitioned to a biosimilar and then to a branded agent. The main outcome measures were number of intravitreal injection events, transitions in medications, and injection intervals. Results: A total of 182 757 eyes with nAMD met inclusion criteria: 136 451 received bevacizumab only; 2184, bevacizumab followed by a biosimilar; 335, bevacizumab followed by a biosimilar, followed by branded medication; and 43 787, bevacizumab followed by a branded agent. Newer agents (faricimab and aflibercept 8 mg) experienced additional delays of 8.6 days compared with aflibercept 2 mg (P P P Conclusions: IRIS Registry cohort data suggest possible demographic differences in patients undergoing medication transitions, including biosimilar agents, as well as delays in care with medication transitions. Economic simulations suggest that multiple transitions may be more costly than direct transitions from…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free