Evidence Hub

Efficacy and utilization of an acceptance and commitment therapy-based smartphone application for smoking cessation among Black adults: secondary analysis of the iCanQuit randomized trial

Margarita Santiago-Torres, Kristin E. Mull, Brianna M. Sullivan, Diana Kwon, Nikki Nollen, Michael J. Zvolensky, Jonathan B. Bricker

Addiction, 2021

554 participants · 18 citations

Abstract

Background and aims: Black adults who smoke are less likely to seek treatment and to succeed in quitting compared with other racial groups. The lack of efficacious and engaging trials for smoking cessation further contributes to this disparity. This study explored whether an acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT)-based smartphone application (iCanQuit) was more efficacious for smoking cessation than a United States Clinical Practice Guidelines (USCPG)-based smartphone application (QuitGuide) among Black adults. Design: Secondary analysis of a two-arm randomized trial with 12-month follow-up. Setting: United States (US). Participants: A total of 554 Black adults who smoke daily were recruited from 34 US states and enrolled between May 2017 and September 2018. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive iCanQuit (n = 274) or QuitGuide (n = 280) for 12 months. Measurements: Smoking cessation outcomes were measured at 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary outcome was self-reported complete-case 30-day point prevalence abstinence (PPA) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were 7-day PPA, missing-as-smoking imputation, multiple imputation, prolonged abstinence, and cessation of all tobacco products at 12 months. Study retention, treatment engagement, and change in ACT-based processes were also compared between arms. Findings: Study retention was 89% at 12 months and did not differ by arm (P > 0.05). The complete-case 30-day PPA was 28% for iCanQuit versus 20% for QuitGuide at…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 554 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free