Evidence Hub

Paradoxical Role of Glucocorticoids in Severe Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia Among Renal Transplant Recipients: Case Series

Xiaoyun Li, WenSheng Yu, Xiang-Ru Chen, Y. Nie, Yong-Jun Liu

The American journal of case reports, 2026

Abstract

Case series Patients: — Final Diagnosis: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) • Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia Symptoms: Dry cough • fever • progressive dyspnea Clinical Procedure: — Specialty: Critical Care Medicine Objective: Unusual or unexpected effect of treatment Background Severe Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) can rapidly progress to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and is associated with high mortality. Glucocorticoids (GCs) play a paradoxical role, constituting a risk factor for infection and a trigger for immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome upon withdrawal; they may also serve as a therapeutic agent for lung injury. We evaluated the efficacy of a standardized triple-therapy regimen designed to address this paradox. Case Reports We analyzed 7 RTRs admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with severe PJP-ARDS between June 2023 and September 2024. The cohort had a median age of 49 years; all patients had prior chronic low-dose GC maintenance therapy without PJP prophylaxis. All diagnoses were confirmed by metagenomic next-generation sequencing. After the onset of severe PJP-ARDS, all immunosuppressive agents were discontinued; patients were treated with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and caspofungin. Early adjunctive intravenous methylprednisolone was administered to all patients, including 4 who received treatment upon ICU admission. The median starting dose was 80 mg/day (range, 40–120 mg/day),…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free