Evidence Hub

Longitudinal modeling of upper extremity function in multiple sclerosis: Associations for clinical and sociodemographic factors

Briggs FB, Yang J, Toljan K, Conway DS, Hersh CM, McGinley MP, Bermel RA, Miller DM et al.

Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2025

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Upper extremity impairment is a common disabling consequence of multiple sclerosis (MS). Little is known about factors influencing upper extremity functioning in MS.

OBJECTIVE: Identify associations with longitudinal changes in upper extremity performance.

METHODS: Using a real-world, retrospective cohort study (4140 persons with MS and 14,544 observations), multivariable repeated-measures analyses were completed for nine-hole peg test (9HPT) dominant and non-dominant hand times and their difference (asymmetry), with clinical, demographic, and social determinants as covariates. Interactions with time (disease duration) were examined.

RESULTS: Cross-sectionally, dominant, and non-dominant hand times were strongly correlated (ρ = 0.78), and moderately correlated with asymmetry, walking speeds, and depressive symptoms. Longitudinally, older age, males, Hispanics, Blacks, ever smokers, public insurance beneficiaries, greater lower-limb impairment, progressive disease, and greater depressive symptoms were independently associated with worsening dominant and non-dominant times. Public insurance beneficiaries, greater lower-limb impairment, progressive disease, and greater depressive symptoms were associated with greater asymmetry. Males accrued dominant hand dysfunction more rapidly and had greater asymmetry than females over time, while those with increasing lower-limb impairment more rapidly experienced asymmetry over time.

DISCUSSION: These findings identify…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free