Evidence Hub

Black and Non-Hispanic White persons with multiple sclerosis: Social determinants of health and health inequities

Ponzano M, Graziano N, Wigley C, Boffa G, Klineova S, Petracca M, Riley C, Howard J et al.

Multiple sclerosis and related disorders, 2026

120 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Distinctive differences in multiple sclerosis (MS) disease severity, progression, and mortality have been observed among different races. Social determinants of health (SDH) can contribute to such racial disparities. This study aims to: 1) compare Non-Hispanic White (NHW) and Black (Bl) persons with MS in terms of MS and SDH; 2) explore the impact of SDH-adjustment in the association between race and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25-FW), 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT).

METHODS

120 patients, self-identified as Bl (n = 60) or NHW (n = 60) persons, were included in this cross-sectional analysis from a prospectively enrolled cohort. We used parametric and non-parametric tests; logistic models were performed to select the most relevant SDH. Univariable linear regression models were used to explore differences in EDSS, T25-FW, 9-HPT, SDMT and models were adjusted for relevant SDH using propensity scores (PS).

RESULTS

Significant racial disparities in adverse SDH were identified in Black persons with MS (BpwMS). BpwMS patients had a higher EDSS (β=0.66, p = 0.022), log-transformed T25-FW (β=0.16, p = 0.001), 9-HPT (β=2.89, p = 0.001) and lower SDMT (β=-5.97, p = 0.003); after PS-adjustment, associations were no longer significant except for T25-FW (β=0.13, p = 0.030) and the magnitude of all coefficients was reduced (EDSS: -27 %, T25-FW: -19 %, 9-HPT: -36 %, SDMT: -45 %).

INTERPRETATION

More efforts are…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 120 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free