Evidence Hub

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions

Katrich AN, Porkhanov VA

Khirurgiia, 2019

106 participants

Abstract

AIM: To continue studying the features of visualization of focal liver lesions by using of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis included 106 patients with morphologically confirmed benign liver tumors and metastases (MTS). Patients were divided into groups regarding morphological criteria: focal-nodular hyperplasia (FNH) - 22 patients, hemangiomas - 26, hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) - 15 and 43 patients with liver MTS. All patients underwent multiparametric ultrasound examination with CEUS.

RESULTS: Characteristic signs of FNH are early contrasting in the arterial phase (AF) and significantly different 'contrasting onset in focus' in comparison with hemangiomas (p<0.001), HCA and MTS (p<0.05). Specific signs: 'spokes of the wheel' symptom and advanced contrast accumulation (96%), 'center-to-edge' filling (86%). There was no contrasting in AF in 42% of patients with hemangiomas. Specific signs are 'peripheral nodular exacerbation' (92%) and 'edge-to-center' filling (76%). WASH-OUT sign is not typical. HCA is characterized by complete (100%) and intensive (80%) centripetal filling. WASH-OUT sing was detected in 6 (40%) patients (p<0.001 for 'wash-out onset' and p<0.005 for 'maximum wash-out time' in comparison with MTS). We did not find specific types of vascular pattern. The most important differential sign of MTS was WASH-OUT sign (100%). Me of 'wash-out onset' sign was 40 (35-56) seconds. Specific signs: 'black hole' symptom -…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 106 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free