Evidence Hub

Prediction of hematoma expansion in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage using support vector machine

Liu J, Xu H, Chen Q, Zhang T, Sheng W, Huang Q, Song J, Huang D et al.

EBioMedicine, 2019

1,157 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a devastating disease with high mortality rate. This study aimed to predict hematoma expansion in spontaneous ICH from routinely available variables by using support vector machine (SVM) method.

METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1157 patients with spontaneous ICH who underwent initial computed tomography (CT) scan within 6 h and follow-up CT scan within 72 h from symptom onset in our hospital between September 2013 and August 2018. Hematoma region was manually segmented at each slice to guarantee the measurement accuracy of hematoma volume. Hematoma expansion was defined as a proportional increase of hematoma volume > 33% or an absolute growth of hematoma volume > 6 mL from initial CT scan to follow-up CT scan. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the association between clinical variables and hematoma expansion. SVM machine learning model was developed to predict hematoma expansion.

FINDINGS: 246 of 1157 (21.3%) patients experienced hematoma expansion. Multivariate analyses revealed the following 6 independent factors associated with hematoma expansion: male patient (odds ratio [OR] = 1.82), time to initial CT scan (OR = 0.73), Glasgow Coma Scale (OR = 0.86), fibrinogen level (OR = 0.72), black hole sign (OR = 2.52), and blend sign (OR = 4.03). The SVM model achieved a mean sensitivity of 81.3%, specificity of 84.8%, overall accuracy of 83.3%, and area under receiver operating…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,157 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free