Evidence Hub

Association of Social Determinants of Health With Brain MRI Outcomes in Individuals With Pediatric Onset Multiple Sclerosis

Ross R, O'Neill KA, Betensky RA, Billiet T, Kenney R, Lovett JT, Maletic-Savatic M, Meeks HD et al.

Neurology, 2024

138 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Accumulating evidence points to worse clinical outcomes among adults with multiple sclerosis (MS) belonging to minority or poverty-affected groups. By contrast, little is known about the outcomes of these populations with pediatric-onset MS (POMS). Individuals with POMS represent 5% of the MS population and are more racially diverse yet have been understudied regarding socioeconomic environment or characteristics. In this study, we investigated the association between childhood social determinants of health (SDOH) and brain MRI outcomes in patients with POMS.

METHODS: This is a retrospective single-site cohort study of patients with POMS with brain MRI quantitatively analyzed using icobrain software to yield total white matter lesion, black hole, whole brain, white matter, and gray matter volumes. All patients with POMS evaluated at New York University Langone MS Center and who underwent high-quality volumetric MRI scans were included in this study. SDOH indicators of race, ethnicity, health insurance type, parental education, and childhood neighborhood social vulnerability index (SVI) were examined for association with MRI outcomes using linear least absolute shrinkage selection operator penalized regression modeling. Disease-modifying therapy (DMT) timing and DMT efficacy were compared for each SDOH category.

RESULTS: A total of 138 patients with POMS (70% female) were included with a mean age of 19.86 years and median disease duration of 4 years…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 138 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free