Evidence Hub

Frequency and determinants of black holes in sirolimus-eluting stent restenosis

Costa Jde R, Mintz GS, Carlier SG, Fujii K, Sano K, Kimura M, Tanaka K, Lui J et al.

The Journal of invasive cardiology, 2006

25 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In-stent neointimal hyperplasia typically has a homogenous echoreflective appearance during intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging. However, the neointimal hyperplasia of some brachytherapy failure lesions contains a very echolucent, dark zone that has been termed black hole. We sought to investigate the frequency and determinants of black holes (BH) after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation.

METHODS: A prospective, consecutive series of 33 intrastent SES restenosis (> 50% neointimal hyperplasia with a minimal lumen area < 4.0 mm2) was studied with IVUS. Patients were divided into 2 groups: 8 patients with BH versus 25 patients without BH.

RESULTS: Fifty percent of the BH cases occurred in saphenous vein graft lesions. BH tissue was noticed in 8% of all patients with in-stent restenosis. Three patients in each group had previous vascular brachytherapy failure (p = 0.1). Compared to non-BH cases, a greater proportion of BH cases occurred after SES treatment of bare-metal stent restenosis (75% vs. 32%; p = 0.035). BH cases presented earlier (89.9 +/- 34.3 vs. 161.3 +/- 78.8 days; p = 0.001) with more severe in-stent restenosis, as indicated by greater absolute and relative amounts of neointimal hyperplasia (41.3 +/- 10.0 vs. 26.9 +/- 19.5 mm3; p = 0.012, and 19.6 +/- 6.8 vs. 10.4 +/- 7.9%; p = 0.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS: Echolucent restenotic tissue (black hole) is more often observed in SES restenosis after treatment of saphenous vein graft lesions…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 25 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free