Evidence Hub

The new Hematoma Maturity Score is highly associated with poor clinical outcome in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage

Serrano E, López-Rueda A, Moreno J, Rodríguez A, Llull L, Zwanzger C, Oleaga L, Amaro S

European radiology, 2022

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to analyze the new combined indicators on noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) to predict functional outcome at discharge, compared to previously individual radiological NCCT signs.

METHODS: Patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) who underwent baseline CT scan were retrospectively analyzed. Black hole (BH) sign, blend sign (BS), island sign (IS), swirl sign (SwS), Barras classification, any hypodensity, any irregularity, and two combined novel indicators-Combined Barras Total Score (CBTS) and Hematoma Maturity Score-were assessed independently by two radiologists blinded to clinical information. Patients were trichotomized depending on the disability or dependency at discharge according to the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS): no symptoms or no significant/mild disability (mRS 0-2); moderate or severe disability (mRS 3-5); and mortality (mRS 6).

RESULTS: One hundred fourteen patients with spontaneous ICH confirmed by NCCT were included in the analysis. Multivariable statistical analysis was adjusted for anticoagulation, hematoma volume, ventricular expansion, hypertension, blood glucose level at admission, age, and history of atrial fibrillation and demonstrated that any hypodensity (OR 4.768, p 0.006), any irregularity (OR 4.768, p 0.006), CBTS ≥ 4 (OR 3.205, p 0.025), and the new Hematoma Maturity Score (Immature) (OR 5.872, p 0.006) are independent predictors of functional outcome at discharge.

CONCLUSIONS: The new…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free