Evidence Hub

Efficacy of enteral feeding by gastrostomy tube placement in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome on body weight and days of hospitalization: A retrospective case series

Sang-Bo Lee, A. Ko, Sowon Park, Kyung Won Kim, Kyong Ihn, I. Ho, Se Hee Kim, H. Kim et al.

Nutrition in clinical practice, 2024

67 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a severe form of drug-resistant epilepsy that begins during childhood and frequently leads to significant neurological impairments. Patients with LGS are likely to receive improper oral nutrition because of issues such as dysphagia and aspiration risk, potentially resulting in long-term tube feeding and eventual gastrostomy tube placement. Therefore, we investigated the effects of gastrostomy tube placement on nutrition outcomes and frequency of hospitalization in LGS.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined 67 patients diagnosed with LGS who had undergone gastrostomy tube placement between January 2005 and August 2022. Comprehensive clinical data and complications arising from the procedure were collected. Patients' nutrition condition and frequency of hospitalizations were analyzed before and after gastrostomy tube placement.

RESULTS

Gastrostomy tube placement was performed for the following reasons: high risk of aspiration (50 out of 67, 74.6%), dysphagia (13 out of 67, 25.4%), persistent nasogastric tube feeding (2 out of 67, 3.0%), and severe malnutrition (2 out of 67, 3.0%). After the procedure, z scores for weight-for-age improved significantly, shifting from -3.35 ± 3.57 to -2.54 ± 2.70 over a 2-year interval (P < 0.001). Additionally, the total days of hospitalization and days of hospitalization due to respiratory symptoms reduced significantly from 41.94 ± 51.76 to 15.27 ± 26.68 (P < 0.001) and from 23.75 ± 36.92 to 10.52 ±…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 67 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free