Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of low-dose rituximab as induction therapy for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis with renal involvement: a Chinese case series

Lin Liu, Hai-Qian Lu, Gu-Ming Zou, Haifeng Wang, Jing Li, Yue Yang, J. Zhang, Xue-Lian Wang et al.

BMC Nephrology, 2023

22 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Background Rituximab (RTX) is a standard therapy for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV). However, the most frequently used dose may lead to severe adverse effects (SAEs). We explored the efficacy and safety of low-dose RTX in Chinese patients with AAV. Methods A total of 22 Chinese patients diagnosed with AAV with renal involvement, including 8 treated with low-dose RTX (400 mg of RTX total over 4 weeks) and 14 treated with cyclophosphamide (CYC), were evaluated. The baseline clinical and pathological data and laboratory parameters during follow-up at months 1, 3, 6, and 12 were collected retrospectively. Results The baseline data showed no significant differences between the two groups. The median peripheral CD19^+ cell counts in the RTX group decreased from 315.0/μL to 1.5/μL at 2 weeks, and to 2.5/μL at 1 month after the first dose. The median SCr level decreased from 267.8 μmol/L before treatment to 151.45 μmol/L at 1 month, 132.75 μmol/L at 3 months, 123.2 μmol/L at 6 months, and 151.9 μmol/L at 12 months in RTX-treated patients. The improvements in renal function, proteinuria, and ANCA titre were not significantly different between the two groups. The SAE rate was significantly lower in the RTX group (one SAE of pneumonia) compared with the CYC group. Conclusions This is the first report that low-dose RTX could be effective for the treatment of Chinese patients with AAV with renal involvement.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 22 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free