Evidence Hub

Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of cefiderocol administered by continuous infusion in a case series of critically ill patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections undergoing continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF)

M. Gatti, M. Rinaldi, T. Tonetti, P. Gaibani, A. Siniscalchi, P. Viale, F. Pea

International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 2023

10 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of cefiderocol administered by continuous infusion (CI) in a case series of critically ill patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections undergoing continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF).

METHODS

Critically ill patients receiving CI cefiderocol during CVVHDF for documented bloodstream infections (BSIs), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and/or complicated intrabdominal infections (cIAIs) caused by CRAB and undergoing therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) from February 2022 to January 2023 were retrospectively assessed. Cefiderocol concentrations were determined at steady-state, and the free fraction (fCss) was calculated. Cefiderocol total clearance (CLtot) was determined at each TDM assessment. fCss/MIC ratio was selected as PD determinant of cefiderocol efficacy and defined as optimal if >4, quasi-optimal if between 1 and 4, and suboptimal if <1.

RESULTS

Five patients with documented CRAB infections (two BSI+VAP, two VAP, and one BSI+cIAI) were included. The maintenance dose of cefiderocol was always of 2g q8h over 8h by CI. Median average fCss was 26.5 mg/L (21.7-33.6 mg/L). Median CLtot was 4.84 L/h (2.04-5.22 L/h). Median CVVHDF dose was 41.1 mL/kg/h (35.5-44.9 mL/kg/h), and residual diuresis was reported in 4/5 cases. Optimal PK/PD target was attained in all cases with a median cefiderocol fCss/MIC ratio of 14.9 (6.6-33.6).

CONCLUSION

CI administration of full…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free