Evidence Hub

Rim lesions in MS at 3T: clinical correlation and possible radiological alternatives for daily practice at lower field strength

Vanheule E, Cambron M, Dobai A, Casselman JW

Journal of neuroradiology = Journal de neuroradiologie, 2024

84 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) have been described as an imaging feature specific to multiple sclerosis (MS) using high-field strength phase-sensitive MR imaging. These lesions are suggested to reflect chronic active inflammation associated with greater disease severity and a more rapid disability progression. The aim of our study is to investigate the relationship between PRLs, clinical parameters, other radiological findings and disease progression.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study included MS patients treated with teriflunomide, fingolimod, natalizumab or ocrelizumab for at least 2 years. PRLs seen at 3T MRI were analysed and correlated with clinical data and radiological progression, defined as an increase of the T2/FLAIR-lesion load during therapy. In the search for alternatives for these PRLs, we defined two additional radiological markers: 'FLAIR-bullet lesions', and on post-contrast black-blood (BB) images, 'BB-bullet lesions'.

RESULTS: We included 84 MS patients of whom 27 (32 %) had at least 1 PRL. PRLs were associated with radiological progression under therapy (p=0.039) and higher clinical disability scores, although only significant for 9-Hole Peg Test (p=0.023). Patients with FLAIR-bullet or BB-bullet lesions at 3T MRI had a higher chance of PRL (p<0.001) with a likelihood ratio of 13.2 for FLAIR-bullets and 12.6 for BB-bullet lesions, thanks to the high negative predictive value of respectively 83 % and 90 %.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 84 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free