Evidence Hub

Correlation between the systemic immune-inflammation indicator (SII) and serum ferritin in US adults: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2015-2018

Yang Zhang, Yang Meng, Mingcong Chen, Krishna Baral, Yicheng Fu, Yang Yang, Lin Cao, Ming-Yi Zhao

Annals medicus, 2023

19,225 participants · 26 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background & Objective The systemic immune-inflammation indicator (SII) has been extensively employed in various diseases for course change, treatment efficacy, or prediction, whereas whether it applies to iron overload or iron deficiency remains unclear. This study aimed at investigating the correlation between SII and serum ferritin in people aged over 20 in the US. Methods The measurements of the systemic immune-inflammation indicator (SII = platelet count × neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio) and serum ferritin of 5491 participants in the NHANES database served as the independent and dependent variables for the present cross-sectional study, respectively. Moreover, the correlation was investigated through and used multiple linear regression, smooth curve fitting, and threshold effect. Results After rigorous inclusion and exclusion of 19,225 participants, a grand total of 5,491 participants conforming to the requirements were covered for relevant analysis. SII showed a significant negative correlation with serum ferritin in unregulated ([β=-0.05,p < 0.0001], micro-regulated [β=-0.02,p = 0.0010], and fully regulated models[β=-0.03,p < 0.0001]). In all participants, the negative correlation between SII and serum ferritin served as a non-linear relationship, as indicated by a smooth curve. Subsequently, in the subgroup analysis (stratified by age, sex, and race) fitted by the smooth curve, the above-mentioned negative correlation turned out to be nonlinear in the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 19,225 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free