Evidence Hub

Long-Term Structural and Functional Restoration of the Retina After Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Surgery for Idiopathic Full-Thickness Macular Holes

Lorenc O, Safranow K, Machalińska A

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026

44 participants

Abstract

Objectives: To characterise longitudinal structural and functional retinal restoration after inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap surgery for idiopathic full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs), with a particular emphasis on postoperative glial proliferation, outer retinal restoration, and structure-function relationships. Methods: This retrospective consecutive case series included 46 eyes of 44 patients with idiopathic FTMH treated using the inverted ILM flap technique. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), microperimetry, fixation stability, and multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) were performed 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Results: Anatomical closure was achieved in all eyes. Complete restoration of both the ELM and EZ increased from 8.7% at 1 month to 45.7% at 6 months and 54.3% at 12 months, whereas severe glial proliferation decreased from 30.4% to 15.2% at 12 months. BCVA, retinal sensitivity, fixation stability, and central mfERG responses improved predominantly between 1 and 6 months postoperatively. In multivariable analysis, lower closure-pattern grade (B = -0.073, 95% CI: -0.141 to -0.005; p = 0.035) and lower glial proliferation grade (B = -0.091, 95% CI: -0.155 to -0.027; p = 0.006) were independently associated with better BCVA at final visit. Conclusions: Retinal healing after inverted ILM flap surgery is a coordinated, time-dependent process involving regression of postoperative gliosis,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 44 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free