Evidence Hub

Long-term outcomes of early posterior scleral contraction for myopic macular retinoschisis in patients up to 30 years

Zheng L, Zhao J, Yu C, Dong L, Xue A, Zhu S

Frontiers in medicine, 2026

27 participants

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the long-term anatomical and functional outcomes of early posterior scleral contraction (PSC) in patients up to 30 years with myopic macular retinoschisis (MRS).

Methods: This retrospective study included 21 patients (27 myopic eyes) with MRS, with or without macular detachment, who underwent PSC and had a postoperative follow-up exceeding 2 years (n = 27). Eyes with MRS underwent PSC, an extraocular procedure involving the placement of a genipin-crosslinked allogeneic strip at the posterior pole to shorten axial length and relieve vitreoretinal traction. Anatomical resolution of MRS, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), axial length change, were analyzed in patients with approximately 5-year follow-up records (the 13-eye main analysis cohort); while the overall safety profile was reported using the 27-eye descriptive cohort.

Results: At approximately postoperative year 5, complete resolution of MRS was achieved in 4 eyes (30.8%, 95% CI: 12.7%-57.6%), and partial resolution occurred in 9 eyes (69.2%, 95% CI: 42.4%-87.3%); BCVA did not improve significantly compared to the baseline level (P = 0.482, n = 13). Mean axial length shortened significantly immediately postoperatively (P n = 13) but gradually regressed to near baseline at approximately postoperative year 5 (P = 0.183, n = 12). In the 27-eye descriptive cohort, no eye progressed to macular hole or retinal detachment, and metamorphopsia all resolved within 8 months. No sight-threatening intra- or…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 27 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free