Evidence Hub

Postoperative Dynamics of Full-Thickness Macular Holes: Insights from High-Resolution OCT Under Gas Tamponade

Francone A, Govetto A, Peñalva J, Albano R, Sanchez G, Rojas J, Camuzzi F, Charles M

Ophthalmology science, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Purpose: To characterize early healing processes of full-thickness macular holes (MHs) after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap using high-resolution swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) under gas tamponade.

Design: Prospective, single-center, interventional, multisurgeon consecutive case series.

Subjects: Consecutive eyes with idiopathic full-thickness MHs undergoing PPV with the inverted ILM flap technique.

Methods: All eyes underwent standardized 25-gauge PPV with temporal inverted ILM flap and 14% octafluoropropane (C3F8) gas tamponade. Pre- and postoperative assessment included high-resolution SS-OCT at predefined intervals from immediately after surgery through 3 months, enabling sequential in vivo evaluation of early and late morphologic changes under gas tamponade.

Main outcome measures: Evaluated features included MH diameter, ILM flap position, hyperreflective bridging tissue, and integrity of the external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone. Closure rates and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were analyzed relative to early SS-OCT findings.

Results: Swept-source OCT imaging succeeded in all 32 eyes despite the gas-filled vitreous cavity. Macular hole closure was documented in 22 eyes (67%) by day 1, 29 eyes (88%) by week 1, and 30 eyes (94%) by month 1. Early intraretinal hyperreflectivity was observed in 30 eyes (94%), correlating with successful closure; its absence was noted in the delayed cases. External limiting…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free