Evidence Hub

Rescue management of recurrent or growing non-acute subdural hematoma following standalone or adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization: A case series and systematic review

Orscelik A, Senol YC, Chaney E, Narsinh K, Amans M, Raper DM, Winkler E, Hetts S et al.

Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2025

22 participants

Abstract

ObjectiveRecurrent or growing non-acute subdural hematoma (SDH) following standalone or adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAe) present a complex clinical challenge. This study aims to investigate the multifactorial causes of recurrence and growing SDH, including vascular and systemic contributors, and explores management strategies to improve outcomes.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 22 patients with non-acute SDH requiring rescue treatment after adjunctive or stand-alone MMAe. Patients with documented trauma deemed responsible for the SDH expansion were excluded. Data were collected on patient demographics, clinical presentations, imaging findings, treatment approaches, and outcomes. A systematic review was also conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases, adhering to PRISMA guidelines.ResultsNon-traumatic recurrent or growing SDHs were associated with MMA recanalization (27%), contralateral supply from the contralateral MMA (27%), CSF-venous fistulas (5%), and recruitments of vascular collaterals such as deep temporal artery (5%). Management strategies included, respectively, repeat MMAe using polyvinyl alcohol particles, coils, and liquid agents; contralateral MMAe, transvenous embolization for CSF-venous fistulas; and targeted embolization for other vascular contributors. Follow-up assessments were available for 14 patients (64%). Of these, 10 patients (45%) achieved complete resolution of symptoms, three patients…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 22 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free