Evidence Hub

Transbronchial Mediastinal Cryobiopsy in Diagnosing Sarcoidosis: A Three-Case Report

Yamada C, Otoshi R, Hagiwara E, Moriuchi A, Tagami Y, Niwa T, Baba T, Sawazumi T et al.

Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2025

Abstract

Recent reports suggest that a transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy (TMC) offers a better diagnostic performance for benign diseases than endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) because it can obtain larger specimens. We herein report the utility of TMC in three patients with sarcoidosis at our institution. EBUS-TBNA failed to diagnose sarcoidosis in all three patients, whereas TMC provided a definitive diagnosis. Although no significant differences in either the safety or procedural complexity were observed between TMC and EBUS-TBNA, the cost of TMC remains a considerable challenge. Further research is required to determine the strategies regarding optimal patient selection for sarcoidosis patients who need a diagnosis of TMC.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free