Evidence Hub

Evaluation of the effects of extremity elongation on brachial plexus nerves via intraoperative neuromonitoring in patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Koyuncu D, Kendirci AŞ, Erşen A

BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026

20 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is one of the most common treatment method for irreparable rotator cuff tear. One of the significant complications of this surgery is nerve injury. This study aimed to identify the patterns of brachial plexus nerve involvement and to determine the surgical stages associated with increased nerve vulnerability during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM). Additionally, the relationship between extremity lengthening, acromiohumeral distance (AHD) changes and intraoperative nerve events were evaluated. METHODS: Twenty patients diagnosed with rotator cuff tear arthropathy who underwent total reverse shoulder arthroplasty in a single center were included in the study. Demographic data, preoperative shoulder range of motion (ROM), and functional scores were recorded. Radiological measurements were performed to evaluate extremity lengthening and preoperative acromiohumeral distances (AHD) differences on both shoulders. The relationship between these values and intraoperative motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude drops was analyzed. The nerves affected and the corresponding surgical stages were documented. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the relationship between nerve involvement and preoperative variables. RESULTS: Among the 20 patients evaluated, the musculocutaneous and radial nerves were most frequently affected, particularly during the glenoid preparation stage. Smoking…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 20 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free