Evidence Hub

Pedicled medial femoral condyle corticoperiosteal flap for achieving union in patients with nonunion of the distal half of the femur (A short case series of three patients)

Kamiel N, Moharram AN, Shaheen A, Ezzat M, Ebeid W

BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025

Abstract

Background: Recalcitrant bone nonunion is characterized by impaired biological potential at the fracture site due to diminished vascularity and loss of osteogenic cells, reducing the success rate of nonvascularized bone grafts. In cases of ununited fractures of the tibia and femur with minimal gapping, the medial femoral condyle (MFC) corticoperiosteal flap offers a promising solution. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the pedicled MFC corticoperiosteal flap in achieving union in recalcitrant nonunion of the distal half of the femur. The secondary objective is to report complications associated with this technique.

Methods: Three male patients with recalcitrant nonunion of the distal half of the femur were included. The transposition ratio was calculated by dividing the distance between the medial femoral epicondyle and the nonunion site (DMEB) by the distance from the medial femoral epicondyle to the apex of the lesser trochanter (DMELT). Patients with a ratio greater than 0.5 were excluded. Each patient underwent adequate rigid fixation, followed by harvesting a pedicled MFC corticoperiosteal flap from the medial distal femur. The flap was rotated to cover the nonunion site and augmented with an iliac crest bone graft to fill residual gaps. Bony union was monitored through monthly X-rays and CT scans.

Results: All three patients (average age 36.7 years) had recalcitrant nonunion, two cases being aseptic atrophic and one septic. Union was achieved in all…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free