Evidence Hub

Histologic and Morphometric Comparison of Drusen Associated With Chronic Retinal Detachment and Aging-Associated Drusen

Nisanova A, Lin JH, Frauches RL, Estrada M, Nelson AJ

Translational vision science & technology, 2026

29 participants

Abstract

Purpose: Drusen are subretinal pigment epithelium extracellular matrix deposits. This study compared histomorphometric characteristics of age-related and atypical drusen found in an eye of a young woman with chronic retinal detachment (RD).

Methods: We conducted a histomorphometric examination of drusen identified in 3 eyes: an eviscerated eye from a 35-year-old woman with chronic RD, and 2 specimens of 2 patients, aged 91 and 77 years, with typical age-related drusen. Sections of formalin-fixed tissue stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), periodic acid-Schiff (PAS), Masson trichrome, luxol fast blue (LFB), and Von Kossa were evaluated using light microscopy. Drusen dimensions were quantified using Philips Digital Pathology Software.

Results: Atypical drusen identified in the RD eye (n = 25) displayed spheroidal shape with peripherally radiating fibrils. There were foci of dystrophic calcification and localized chronic choroidal inflammation and within some drusen. Age-related drusen (n = 29) had a typical dome-shaped appearance. Atypical drusen had significantly larger (P < 0.001) average circumference (278 vs. 52 µm), diameter (96 vs. 20 µm), and area (0.006 vs. 0.00022 mm2) than age-related drusen, respectively. Both groups stained positively with PAS, negatively with LFB and Von Kossa, and blue on Masson Trichrome.

Conclusions: Atypical drusen found in this RD case display significant differences in morphometric parameters compared to age-related drusen but similar…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 29 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free