Evidence Hub

Interventional Radiology-Guided Foley Catheterization for Pelvic Fracture with Urethral Injury: A Single-Center Retrospective Case Series

Chung H, Park MH, Jung E, Kim S, Kim JG, Choi YU

Journal of clinical medicine, 2026

492 participants

Abstract

Background/Objectives: In male trauma patients suspected of having a pelvic fracture with urethral injury (PFUI), repeated urethral catheterization attempts can cause additional injury. Since 2021, our institution has been performing simultaneous percutaneous cystostomy using a guidewire and anterograde urethral Foley catheter insertion during pelvic angiography in patients with suspected PFUI. We aimed to analyze the characteristics and clinical course of this patient group. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed male trauma patients who were admitted to our emergency department between January 2021 and December 2025, and who underwent the aforementioned interventional procedure after standard Foley catheterization failed because of a pelvic fracture-associated urethral injury. The age, mechanism of injury, injury severity score (ISS), abbreviated injury scale, type of pelvic fracture, use of pelvic angiography, time from emergency room arrival to Foley catheterization, and administration of additional urological treatments were investigated. Results: Among 492 male patients with pelvic fractures, 11 underwent the procedure because of PFUI (age: 57.8 ± 13.9 years, ISS: 20.2 ± 9.6). Pelvic crushing was the most common injury mechanism, and pelvic angiography was performed in 81.8% of cases. The mean time from emergency room arrival to interventional Foley catheterization was 283 ± 250 min. Three patients required additional urological treatment after the acute phase, and all…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 492 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free