Evidence Hub

Analysis of retinal microstructure and electrophysiology in eyes following pars plana vitrectomy and membrane peeling for vitreomacular interface disorders

Chen IH, Li MS, Tseng CL, Tu HP, Sheu SJ

BMC ophthalmology, 2025

44 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the relationship between retinal structural biomarkers using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and macular function before and after surgery.

Methods: Forty-four eyes of 44 patients were included. Ophthalmological examinations included visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure, OCT angiography (OCTA), and multi-focal electroretinography (mf-ERG) at baseline (pre-surgery) and post-operative follow-up. The ILM texture during peeling was graded by the surgeon as follows: Grade 1, fragile; Grade 2, easy to peel in a sheet; and Grade 3, sticky. The cross-sectional area of the ganglion cell layer and central retinal thickness in the fovea were evaluated using ImageJ software of SD-OCT. The presence of a dissociated optic nerve fiber layer (DONFL) was evaluated using en face OCTA images. mf-ERG results are shown as the ratio between the average amplitudes from rings 1 and 2 (central) and rings 4 and 5 (peripheral): the P1 ratio.

Results: Based on the SD-OCT morphological characteristics of the foveal area, 14 cases were classified into ERM group 1 (mainly outer retinal thickening or more tenting of the outer retina), 11 into ERM group 2 (prominent inner retinal thickening), 9 into ERM group 3 (ERM with macular hole), and 10 into ERM group 4 (full thickness macular hole without ERM and vitreomacular traction without ERM). Morphological characteristics were correlated with ILM texture (p = 0.0031) and DONFL (p < 0.0001). Group 2 and group 3…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 44 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free