Evidence Hub

Suture-Button Repair Improves Outcomes in Arthroscopically Diagnosed Chronic Syndesmotic Injury Despite Low Imaging Sensitivity

Vinje T, Inderhaug E, Jarning J, Hole RM, Vetti N, Malt MA, Matre K

Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2025

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate patient-reported outcomes after arthroscopic suture-button repair of chronic isolated syndesmotic injuries and to compare the diagnostic sensitivity of standard imaging with arthroscopy.

Methods: Patients with chronic (≥3 months) syndesmotic injuries confirmed by arthroscopy (≥2 mm widening) who underwent suture-button repair between 2017 and 2021 were included. Exclusion criteria were ankle fractures, previous major surgery, or significant arthritis. Foot Function Index and Foot-and-Ankle Ability Measure scores were recorded preoperatively as part of routine clinical assessment and at final follow-up. The minimal clinically important difference was defined as 75% of preoperative standard deviation.

Results: Forty-one patients (43 ankles) were analyzed. Median age was 32 years (15-57 years), 63% were female, and time from injury to surgery was 1.7 years (0.25-25). Fifteen ankles (35%) received concomitant lateral suture-tape stabilization. Arthroscopic syndesmotic widening was 2-3 mm in 5%, 3-4 mm in 10%, >4 mm in 46%, and posterior in 38%. All 6 Foot Function Index and Foot-and-Ankle Ability Measure subscores improved significantly (P < .001), with 79% to 93% achieving minimal clinically important difference at a median 2.3-year follow-up (1.0-4.8). Sensitivity for syndesmotic pathology was 5% for radiographs and stress fluoroscopy, 22% for computed tomography, and 26% for magnetic resonance imaging.

Conclusions: Arthroscopic suture-button repair led to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free