Evidence Hub

Clinical Experience With an Aragonite-Based Scaffold Implant for Knee Cartilage Repair: A Multicenter Case Series

Amin NH, Faucett SC, Qin C, Malempati CS, Patel RM, Dougherty CP, Lim A, Kendall C et al.

Cureus, 2025

33 participants

Abstract

Background There is a growing interest in the use of biomaterials to treat chondral and osteochondral knee lesions, given their ability to replicate the biological and functional properties needed for simultaneous cartilage and bone regeneration. A novel aragonite-based, cell-free biomimetic scaffold (CARTIHEAL AGILI-CTM, Smith + Nephew, UK) was developed for treating chondral and osteochondral defects in traumatic and osteoarthritic joints. A short-term follow-up study was designed to assess the safety and feasibility of this scaffold. Materials and methods This retrospective review included data from nine centers in the United States (US) between August 22, 2023 and December 30, 2024. Adult patients (≥18 years of age) who received the aragonite-based scaffold as standard of care for the treatment of knee chondral/osteochondral lesions in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions for use were eligible. There were no prespecified exclusion criteria. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for radiologic assessment of knee cartilage lesions, which informed the development of presurgical plans. A diagnostic arthroscopy was performed before arthrotomy to confirm the radiographic findings obtained for preoperative planning. The primary endpoint was the incidence of early clinical and radiographic complications occurring within at least 30 days after the operation. Secondary endpoints included an assessment of the accuracy of presurgical planning relative to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 33 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free