Evidence Hub

ECMO-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis for post-traumatic pulmonary embolism with bilateral atrial thrombi: a retrospective case series

Kang Y, Chen Y, Tian X, Liu C

Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026

16 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We retrospectively evaluated the feasibility and short-term outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)–assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis in this high-risk population and descriptively characterized the accompanying biomarker trajectories. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 16 adults presenting 9–13 days post-trauma with CT pulmonary angiography (CTA)-confirmed extensive bilateral PE and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-verified atrial thrombi who underwent V-A ECMO–assisted CDT in a single tertiary center. Primary outcomes were imaging-documented thrombus resolution, hemodynamic stabilization, in-hospital survival, and 90-day functional status. A streamlined biomarker panel—including a coagulation profile (D-dimer, fibrinogen, aPTT, anti-Xa, PT/INR), cardiac markers (troponin, BNP), and markers of perfusion/hemolysis (lactate, free hemoglobin, LDH) plus IL-6, and at decreasing frequencies post-wean as a secondary, exploratory monitoring tool. RESULTS: In this retrospective case series of 16 adults with post-traumatic PE and bilateral atrial thrombi, ECMO-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis was technically feasible in all patients and was not interrupted for device- or access-related complications. Median ECMO duration was 6 days (IQR 5–7), and median hospital stay was 14 days (IQR 12–16). Survival was 15 of 16 (93.8%): one patient died of hemorrhagic shock and one of sepsis. Among survivors, complete radiographic resolution of both…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 16 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free