Evidence Hub

A visual mining analysis of middle meningeal embolization and other factors associated with recurrence requiring re-operation in subdural hematomas: a single-center series

Battistelli M, Vezzoli M, Valente I, Benenati M, Garignano G, Alexandre A, Agostini L, Santi S et al.

Acta neurochirurgica, 2025

500 participants

Abstract

Purpose: to comprehensively and hierarchically assess risk factors for recurrence requiring reoperation (RrR) in chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) in the era of middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE).

Methods: Patients treated for a cSDH from January 2019 to October 2024 at Fondazione Gemelli research hospital were considered for inclusion. Clinical, coagulation, radiological, and treatment factors were recorded. MMAE was performed systematically from October 2022, using polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles injected directly from the main trunk of MMA. The dataset comprised 45 quantitative and qualitative variables for each cSDH. Variables showing statistical significance (p-value < 0.05) were selected as covariates in two supervised learning frameworks to predict the RrR (outcome, Y): (i) Classification and Regression Tree (CART) and (ii) Random Forest (RF) classifier.

Results: 500 patients were eligible and 233 were included, resulting in 283 treated cSDHs (mean follow-up: 119 days); 129 underwent adjuvant MMAE. 50 cSDH had a RrR (mean time to recurrence: 47 days), of which 41 (82%) in the non-embolized group and 9 (18%) in the embolized group (p-value 9/L strongly impacts RrR risk for substantial cSDH volumes.

Conclusions: The present results support the routine use of MMAE and the correction of PLT in relation to cSDH volume.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 500 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free