Evidence Hub

Combination of tofacitinib and tacrolimus therapy in refractory interstitial lung disease associated with anti-synthetase syndrome: a case series of six patients

Qiu-Yu Fan, Wei Huang, Shao-Hui Song, Hui-Qin Yang, Ya Liu, Chao Jia, Yun-Dai Xiao, Liang Zou

Frontiers in Immunology, 2026

6 participants

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and tacrolimus (TAT) combination therapy for treating refractory interstitial lung disease (ILD) associated with anti-synthetase syndrome (ASyS-ILD). Method Patients with refractory ASyS-ILD who were treated with TAT at Wuhan No. 1 Hospital were included in the study from January 2020 to May 2024. A retrospective analysis of the clinical data from these patients is presented. Result A total of six patients, one male patient and five female patients, primarily presented with refractory ASyS-ILD. All patients experienced symptomatic relief following TAT therapy, which facilitated the successful tapering of glucocorticoids (GCs, 24.67 ± 17.42 vs. 8.34 ± 1.89, p = 0.004). After treatment, PGA, PGA-VAS, PhGA-VAS, and MMT-8 scores significantly improved, and diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO) increased in all 6 patients. Moreover, the serum levels of creatine kinase (CK) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were notably reduced, and inflammatory indices, including C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), declined significantly in all patients after administration of TAT. Additionally, peripheral white blood cell and neutrophil counts were significantly reduced, while lymphocyte counts increased, with a markedly decreased neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in patients with ASyS-ILD receiving treatment. However, during treatment, two patients developed herpes zoster, which…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 6 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free