Evidence Hub

Post-Traumatic Bruch’s Membrane Rupture: A Case Series Highlighting Imaging Features and Long-Term Complications

B. Azarkan, Z. Hilali, S. Benchekroun, N. Boutimzine, L. O. Cherkaoui

International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Case Reports, 2025

Abstract

Aims: To describe the clinical presentation, imaging features, and outcomes of post-traumatic Bruch’s membrane rupture (BMR), emphasizing the importance of long-term surveillance.

Presentation of Case: We report three young male patients (ages 18, 24, and 26; mean ≈23 years) presenting with unilateral closed-globe contusive ocular trauma leading to BMR. Two cases were due to work-related high-velocity metallic impacts and one from blunt trauma by a tennis ball. Initial visual acuity (VA) in affected eyes was severely reduced to counting fingers at 1 meter, with normal vision (10/10) in fellow eyes. Fundus examination, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) revealed rupture lines, subretinal hemorrhage, and macular pseudo-hole formation (~581 µm in one case). Fluorescein angiography (FA) identified rupture-related window defects without leakage.

Discussion: Multimodal imaging, particularly OCT and OCT-angiography (OCT-A), was essential for diagnosis and monitoring. Short-term complications included pseudo-macular hole formation and macular folds with transient hypotony and secondary ocular hypertension. All patients remain under long-term surveillance due to the risk of choroidal neovascularization (CNV).

Conclusion: Post-traumatic BMR can cause significant visual impairment. Early recognition and long-term follow-up are crucial to detect complications and guide timely intervention.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free