Evidence Hub

Macular hole associated with toxoplasmosis: a surgical case series.

D. Sousa, G. C. de Andrade, H. Nascimento, A. Maia, C. Muccioli

Retinal cases & brief reports, 2018

11 participants · 11 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE

There are currently limited data addressing the surgical outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in toxoplasmosis-related macular hole (tMH). We aim to report and discuss safety and efficacy of PPV for tMH.

METHODS

Surgical case series (n = 11), with minimum postoperative follow-up time of 6 months. Consecutive patients who underwent PPV for tMH from 2013 to 2016 were included. Indications for surgery were: visual acuity ≥ 0.6 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (Snellen 20/80 or less), no intraocular inflammation for more than 6 months, extrafoveal toxoplasmosis scar, elevated tMH borders on optical coherence tomography, and patient agreement with surgery. Surgery was performed-PPV with epiretinal (if present) and internal limiting membrane peeling. Safety and efficacy of PPV for tMH were addressed by evaluating: 1) surgery-related complications and 2) visual acuity improvement.

RESULTS

A total of 11 patients (6 male), with a mean age of 33.2 ± 11.0 years were studied. Mean preoperative best-corrected visual acuity significantly improved from 1.10 ± 0.24 (Snellen 20/252) to 0.43 ± 0.18 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (Snellen 20/54) at last follow-up visit (P < 0.01). The rate of visual acuity improvement (i.e., a gain of at least three lines) and tMH closure was 100% for both. The only reported surgery-related complication was cataract in one case.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that PPV is a safe and effective option in tMH cases. A…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 11 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free