Evidence Hub

Toxicological analysis of serious drug-related harm among electronic dance music festival attendees in New South Wales, Australia: A consecutive case series

Eleanor Black, L. Govindasamy, R. Auld, Kylie McArdle, Caroline Sharpe, A. Dawson, Santiago Vázquez, J. Brett et al.

Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 2020

23 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A substantial increase in drug-related harm was observed during the 2018-2019 music festival season in New South Wales, Australia, including the deaths of five young people. As part of a rapid public health response, the New South Wales Ministry of Health referred samples from patients with suspected severe drug-related illness for forensic toxicological testing to identify the type and concentration of substances associated with the presentations.

METHODS

Cases were identified through a variety of active and passive surveillance systems, and selected consecutively based on indicators of clinical severity. Comprehensive toxicology testing of blood and urine samples was expedited for all cases. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collated, together with quantitative toxicology results. Results were analysed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Forty cases from eleven different music festivals were included. The majority of cases (80.0%) were aged 25 years and under. There were five fatalities, and 62.5% of cases were admitted to intensive care units. MDMA was the most frequent substance, detected in 87.5% of cases. In 82.9% of cases with MDMA, blood concentrations were above thresholds that have been associated with toxicity. Multiple substances were detected in 60.0% of cases. Novel psychoactive substances were not detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings strongly suggest that MDMA-related toxicity was a major factor in the severity of the clinical…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free