Evidence Hub

Ferromagnetism and MR imaging: safety of carotid vascular clamps

Teitelbaum GP, Lin MC, Watanabe AT, Norfray JF, Young TI, Bradley WG

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 1990

Abstract

Metallic extracranial carotid vascular clamps of the Selverstone, Crutchfield, Poppen-Blaylock, Salibi, Kindt, and tantalum varieties have been placed for treatment of large, giant, or inoperable intracranial aneurysms. To ascertain what adverse effect, if any, MR imaging would have on these clamps, magnetic deflection at 1.5 T was measured for various carotid clamps. Marked magnetic deflection (and torque) was displayed by stainless steel Poppen-Blaylock clamps. Relatively mild magnetic deflection was displayed by the stainless steel Selverstone, Salibi, Crutchfield, and Kindt clamps. Three patients with previously placed carotid clamps (two Selverstone, one Salibi) and one patient with a nonferromagnetic tantalum carotid clip had cranial or cervical MR studies at field strengths ranging from 0.35 to 0.60 T. No patient experienced any discomfort or neurologic sequelae as a result of MR imaging. Although the ferromagnetic clamps created severe "black-hole" artifacts and image distortion within the cervical and facial regions, no significant image degradation was apparent during spin-echo imaging of the brain. The tantalum clip created a far smaller MR artifact than did ferromagnetic clamps and allowed effective spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging in the cervical region. Our findings indicate that most patients with carotid vascular clamps (and nonferromagnetic clips) can probably be imaged safely with MR.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free