Evidence Hub

Nothingness, meaninglessnes, chaos, and the "black hole" revisited

Chessick RD

The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 1995

Abstract

In the present article some clinical material involving complaints of nothingness, meaninglessness, chaos, and the "black hole" is presented and discussed. The purpose of the discussion is to illustrate that it is not possible to interpret this material solely as representing the reemergence of psychosis or early infantile catastrophic states. It is necessary to analyze this material, along with all other material, on at least five channels of therapeutic listening that I have described in previous work on the subject. These channels are the traditional Freudian, the Kleinian, self psychology, the phenomenological, and the interactional channels of listening. They are based on utterly incompatible premises. In this article I reviewed them briefly and then tried to illustrate how they may be applied to the same clinical material. One hopes that it has been demonstrated that the emergence of this characteristic nothingness, meaninglessness, chaos, void, and black hole material should not be automatically attributed to any one underlying intrapsychic situation, but can have many meanings in one patient as well as a variety of different meanings in different patients. Because this material is so dramatic when it emerges and is relatively common in the patients we see in our clinical work today, it is very important not to be misled by preconceived notions of what it means; one might even argue that the insistence on certain preconceived interpretations of given material…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free