Evidence Hub

Pulmonary actinomycosis with "balls-in-a hole" appearance diagnosed by examination of bronchial lavage fluid

Morikawa T, Takeuchi K, Tanaka Y, Furuiye H, Fukumura M, Mikami R, Yamagata T, Kakuta Y et al.

Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai zasshi = the journal of the Japanese Respiratory Society, 1998

Abstract

A 49-year-old man was referred to our hospital because of abnormal chest X-ray findings. Chest X-ray films showed infiltrative opacities in the right lung, and histological findings of a transbronchial biopsy specimen showed non-specific inflammation. The patient was treated with Ofloxacin for one month. After the treatment, chest X-ray films showed that the infiltrative opacities in the right upper lobe had decreased, but that opacities in the right lower lobe had increased, with an air meniscus sign. A chest computed tomography scan at the same time revealed that the remaining opacities contained multiple mass-like lesions within a cavity in the right S6, appearing as "balls in a hole". One year after the first visit, the patient visited the hospital again because of cough and sputum. A chest X-ray film showed that the size of the cavity in the right lower lobe had increased. The histological findings from a fresh transbronchial biopsy specimen revealed a non-specific inflammation again; however, black clots obtained from bronchial lavage fluid after biopsy were histologically identified as sulfur granules, a classic pathological indication of actinomycosis. This confirmed the diagnosis of pulmonary actinomycosis. The patient was treated with penicillin, and the opacities in the right lower lobe subsided.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free