Evidence Hub

Cerebellar Perfusion Changes After Repetitive Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Parkinson’s Disease: A Five-Patient Case Series and Literature Review

In-Uk Song, Yong-An Chung, Byungseok Kim, Seunghee Na, Sonya Youngju Park

Diagnostics, 2026

Abstract

Background and Clinical Significance: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder for which nonpharmacological neuromodulatory approaches are being explored as adjunctive strategies. Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS) using an H-coil can engage broader and deeper cortical networks than conventional focal coils, although anatomically distant structures are expected to be influenced through network modulation rather than direct electromagnetic stimulation. Case Presentation: We describe a five-patient exploratory case series evaluating clinical measures and cerebral perfusion before and three months after high-frequency dTMS targeting the supplementary motor area (SMA). Clinical outcomes included the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Parts I-IV, Non-Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS), Hoehn–Yahr stage, and Timed Up and Go test. Antiparkinsonian medication regimens and doses remained unchanged during the three-month follow-up. Cerebral perfusion was assessed using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and statistical parametric mapping. No clinical outcome reached nominal statistical significance at follow-up; given the sample size, this should be interpreted as limited statistical power rather than evidence of no effect. At an exploratory voxel-wise threshold of p < 0.001, uncorrected, SPECT identified a 28-voxel cluster of increased regional cerebral blood flow in the right cerebellar cortex (peak MNI coordinates: 22,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free