Evidence Hub

Full-Thickness Macular Hole After Faricimab Treatment for Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion-Associated Macular Edema with Vitreomacular Traction: A Case Report

Hiroki Sano, Ryoji Yanai, Yoshinori Mitamura

The American journal of case reports, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Patient: Female, 72-year-old Final Diagnosis: Full-thickness macular hole following intravitreal faricimab injection for branch retinal vein occlusion-associated macular edema with vitreomacular traction Symptoms: Decreased visual acuity Clinical Procedure: — Specialty: Ophthalmology Objective: Unusual clinical course Background Branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) is a common cause of vision loss in older adults, and cystoid macular edema (CME) is its most frequent vision-threatening complication. Depending on severity, vitreomacular traction (VMT) is typically managed with observation or surgery. When CME develops during observation (e.g., in BRVO), the therapeutic approach becomes more complex. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is a standard treatment for CME secondary to BRVO. Although full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) formation is rare, it has been reported in eyes with preexisting VMT, suggesting a contributory role for tractional forces. Case Report A 72-year-old woman under observation for VMT developed BRVO with CME. Baseline optical coherence tomography revealed VMT, an epiretinal membrane, a lamellar macular hole, and a vertical hyperreflective line at the fovea resembling the “foveal crack sign”. The patient received an intravitreal faricimab injection to achieve rapid edema resolution with fewer injections. CME improved; however, an FTMH subsequently developed, accompanied by a decline in best-corrected visual acuity to 20/33. The patient…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free