Evidence Hub

Double-tube burr hole irrigation in the treatment of subdural empyema following chronic subdural hematoma surgery: A case report

Manato Sakamoto, S. Yokoya, M. Ichihashi, Kengo Kishida, Hideki Oka

International journal of surgery case reports, 2024

1 citation

Abstract

Introduction and importance Subdural empyema (SE) following chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) surgery is an uncommon but serious complication. The best treatment approach, typically a choice between craniotomy and burr hole surgery, is still debated. This case report introduces an innovative method using burr hole surgery with double-tube irrigation, a potentially effective alternative to the more invasive craniotomy. Case presentation An 81-year-old male, 48 days post-CSDH surgery, developed SE with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. The initial treatment with burr hole drainage was complicated by recurrence, leading to a second procedure with double tubes inserted anteriorly and posteriorly for continuous irrigation therapy. The patient was treated with systemic antibiotics and vancomycin irrigation, resulting in successful resolution without further recurrence. Clinical discussion While burr hole surgery is often deemed less effective than craniotomy for SE, this case demonstrates the potential efficacy of double-tube irrigation via burr hole surgery. This method could be especially beneficial when craniotomy poses significant risks. Continuous irrigation could help in managing intracranial pressure, making the intervention safer. However, further research is needed to refine this technique and establish clear treatment guidelines. Conclusion Burr hole surgery with double-tube irrigation emerges as a promising treatment option for SE, especially when…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free