Evidence Hub

AB0690 USE of mycophenolate in systemic sclerosis. case series

Jose Luis Tandaipan Jaime, E. R. Alonso, Alba Álvarez-Abella, M. Vilella, G. Alarcón, M. Pujol, S. M. Pardo

Abstracts accepted for Publication, 2019

Abstract

Background: At present, there are not specific targets to treat or prevent Systemic Sclerosis (SSc), but there are some to reduce the impact of its associated complications. Although mycophenolate (MP) is not recommended in latest EULAR SSc guidelines to treat cutaneous and pulmonary manifestations, its efficacy is known, based on observational studies and the Sclerodermalungstudy II. Objectives: To describe our center’s experience in treating SSc patients with MP. Methods: Descriptive series of SSc patients treated with MP from November 2017 to December 2018. Demographic, clinical, analytical, spirometric, radiological (HR-CT) and modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) data were collected. Results: Case 1: woman diagnosed at 42 years old with diffuse SSc, having positive anti-toposiomerase-I antibody (ATA), telangiectasias, pitting scars, scleroderma and Non-specific interstitial Pneumonia (NSIP) without significant alterations in spirometry. One year after diagnosis, as a result of skin worsening (mRSS 21), we started MP in association with prednisone (mean dose 5 mg. A day). After treatment for 14 months, she showed significant improvement (mRSS 9) without spirometric changes. Case 2: woman diagnosed at 30 years old with diffuse SSc, having positive aTA, pitting scars, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and scleroderma. This same year, we started MP due to skin involvement (mRSS 14), improving significantly (mRSS 9) after 14 months of treatment. Case 3: woman diagnosed at…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free