Evidence Hub

AB0161 early initiation of quadruple therapy in patients with anti-melanoma differentiation-associated 5 gene antibody-positive (MDA5) dermatomyositis (DM) with rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD) – a retrospective case series

K. Chong, Mingqi Ma, F. Teo, P. Cheung

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2023

1 citation

Abstract

MDA5 autoantibodies have been associated with an amyopathic form of dermatomyositis, with a subset developing RP-ILD with high mortality of 50%, despite intensive immunosuppressive therapies like high dose prednisolone, cyclophosphamide and calcineurin inhibitors.[1]Tofacitinib and rituximab have also been used as single agents, mainly as salvage therapy.[2]We aimed to investigate the role of early use of quadruple therapy (high dose steroids, one dose of cyclophosphamide, tofacitinib, rituximab) in patients with anti-MDA5 Ab-positive DM with RP-ILD.This is a retrospective case series involving 4 patients with anti-MDA5 Ab-positive DM with RP-ILD from 2019 to 2021. They were treated with quadruple therapy. Their clinical outcomes including survival and adverse events were evaluated.At initial diagnosis of RP-ILD, all patients were given pulsed methylprednisolone and 1 dose of cyclophosphamide. Tofacitinib was started within 2 weeks, followed by rituximab. 3 patients achieved clinical and biochemical improvement over time, with reduction of glucocorticoids by 6 months. Of the 4 patients, 1 required ICU stay and died. Severe adverse events were observed, most of which were infective complications.Table 1.Characteristics of patients with anti-MDA5 Ab-positive DM with RP-ILDCase 1Case 2Case 3Case 4Age/Gender60 F72 F48 M61 FClinical Presentation1stsymptom onset to RP-ILD4 weeks5 weeks4 weeks8 weeksSystemicFever, LOA, LOWFever, LOA, LOWFever, LOWFeverRespiratoryCough, hoarse…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free