Evidence Hub

Ultrasound backscattering from non-aggregating and aggregating erythrocytes--a review

Cloutier G, Qin Z

Biorheology, 1997

Abstract

The objective of the present paper is to provide a detailed review of theoretical, experimental and clinical works aimed at understanding the scattering of ultrasound by red blood cells (RBC). The paper focuses on the role of biofluid mechanics and blood biorheology on the scattering mechanisms. The influence of RBC aggregation on the ultrasound backscattered power is specifically addressed. After a short introduction, the paper presents the theory of Rayleigh scattering and summarizes theoretical models on ultrasound backscattering by RBC. The particle, continuum and hybrid models are presented along with reported packing factors used to consider the orderliness in the spatial arrangement of RBC. Computer models of ultrasound backscattering by RBC are also presented in this section. In the second section, experimental factors affecting the ultrasound backscattered power from blood are presented. The influence of the volume of the scatterers, ultrasound frequency, hematocrit, orientation of the scatterers, flow turbulence, flow pulsatility, and concentration of fibrinogen and dextran is discussed. The third section focuses on the use of ultrasound to characterize RBC aggregation. Three aspects are reported: the shear rate dependence of the backscattered power, the "black hole" phenomenon, and the kinetics of RBC rouleau formation. The fourth section reports in vivo observations of the "smoke like" echo in mitral valve disease, and blood echogenicity and backscattered power…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free